Browse or find a wordSearch by idea, purpose, familiarity, setting, or landing.
Be more particular
intransigence
in-TRAN-si-junss
- 01Understand
- 02Hear
- 03Distinguish
- 04See it used
- 05Choose how it lands
A stubborn refusal to compromise or change one’s position.
It lets you name a refusal to move as the actual obstacle, in language calm enough to survive being written down.
Stubbornness is a trait somebody carries everywhere. Intransigence is a refusal to move inside one particular dispute.
work“Three rounds of talks failed on the intransigence of one department.”
public life“The intransigence on both sides has become the story.”
thought“I called it principle at the time. I can see now how much of it was intransigence.”
Reporting to your director why a joint project with another team has not moved in a month.
Meaning held still: Make clear the delay is the other team's refusal to move, without sounding like a complaint about people.
“The delay isn't capacity. It's intransigence on the specification.”
It lands as: Turns a private frustration into a nameable position, which is easier to escalate.
Tradeoff: The formal word reads as a charge, and charges invite a defence rather than a fix.“They won't move on the specification, and that is the whole delay.”
It lands as: Plain enough that the director can act on it in the next sentence.
Tradeoff: Puts the other team in the wrong on the record, which may cost you later.“We're stuck on the specification, and I don't think another meeting shifts it.”
It lands as: Reports the deadlock without assigning it, which keeps the room open.
Tradeoff: Leaves your director unsure whose decision is actually blocking the work.Restrained
- certainty
- turns private frustration into a nameable position, not capacity but intransigence on the specification
- exposure
- the formal word reads as a charge inviting defence
Direct
- cadence
- plain enough for the director to act on in the next sentence, they won't move
- exposure
- puts the other team in the wrong on the record
Tactful
- distance
- reports the deadlock without assigning it, stuck with no meeting likely to shift it
- exposure
- leaves the director unsure whose decision blocks
“Schedule a fifth meeting with a bigger room and both directors; more seniority in the room will surely move what four meetings didn't.”
Why it tempts: Escalation by attendance feels like progress without anyone having to name the problem.
Why it misses: Four meetings have established that the other team's position doesn't move by meeting: the fifth converts two directors' hours into the same deadlock with better catering, the real question, whether their refusal is policy or preference, stays unasked, and your report next month explains why the joint project is now two months stalled. The intention is to name the refusal as the actual obstacle in escalation-ready language, because intransigence is the word that converts a frustration into a decision item, and decision items are what directors can actually move.
Watch for: Intransigence describes a refusal to compromise, not a wrong opinion. Somebody can be intransigent and still be right.
First met in The Weight of an Empty Frame. Saving keeps that example with the word.